Here's a brief excerpt, where Auerbach sums up what he sees as key differences in the distinctive styles of Homer and the Biblical authors:
"We have compared these two texts [from Genesis and Homer], and, with them, the two kinds of style they embody, in order to reach a starting point for an investigation into the literary representation of reality in European culture. The two styles, in their opposition, represent basic types:More about Mimesis here and here. Auerbach's description might be useful to keep in mind when we take a few minutes during the session to look at some of Rembrandt's images of Abraham and other Old Testament figures with Arline.
- on the one [Homeric] hand fully externalized description, uniform illumination, uninterrupted connection, free expression, all events in the foreground, displaying unmistakable meanings, full elements of historical development and of psychological perspective;
- on the other [Biblical] hand, certain parts brought into high relief, others left obscure, abruptness, suggestive influence of the unexpressed, "background" quality, multiplicity of meanings and the need for interpretation, universal-historical claims, development of the concept of the historically becoming, and preoccupation with the problematic." Mimesis, chap. 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment